Follow up

I had lots of questions about my last post regarding card details and photo details. I thought I'd answer them here.

Grateful Card

Card stock- Stampin' Up Very Vanilla, Chocolate Chip
Ink- Memento Black
Other- Copic Markers, Clip by Paper Studio, Ribbon by May Arts, Nestabilities Rectangles
Embossed Background- Cuttlebug Embossing Folder "Argyle"

Photo

That is Alicia, my 13 year old daughter in the picture.
The photo was taken with a Canon Digital Rebel XT. 
Setting- Macro, no flash, natural morning sunlight

Now, I have a question for you. Do you like this typeface?  I kind of like the way it looks with the clean style of my blog but I want it to be comfortable for you.  I used it in my last post. What do you think?

Posted by Gina K at 9/9/2008 7:16 PM
Categories: uncategorized
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this post
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  • 9/9/2008 7:50 PM Sandy (sandy stamps on SCS) wrote:
    I like the type face but would love it too be ONE size larger so that it would be easier to read.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 7:50 PM Anita wrote:
    I like the font. It makes it easy to read!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 7:50 PM Kelly L wrote:
    Honestly, the typeface is a little small for me. Even though I am in my 30s, I sit and look at a computer screen all day long. So . . . I usually magnify font this small just a little bit (maybe another 10%) to not have the "squint factor." LOL Other than that, I do like the nice clean look. And I can always magnify it on my own if everybody else likes it the way it is. Kel
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 7:50 PM RenĂ©e K wrote:
    Gina - I love this typeface - the "sans" fonts are always easier on the eyes, I think.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 7:52 PM Charlene H. wrote:
    I find it easy to read and like your bold headings. It's very neat and tidy looking.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 7:53 PM Julie wrote:
    I agree with everyone else, like the font just wish it was a tad bit bigger.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:07 PM Mary Dawn wrote:
    i do prefer this font, and the photo of the acorn is brilliant
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:09 PM Janet Swofford wrote:
    I love your blog. Your creativity is wonderful. In answer to your question about the typeface,it's a bit small for these old eyes.Thing are getting harder to see every day. I like the clean style but if you could make it larger that would be great. Thanks for sharing all of your beautiful ideas with us. Your daughters are beautiful ,btw!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:10 PM Debbie McKelvey wrote:
    I love the font but think the size should be bigger. The picture of Alicia and the acorn is beautiful.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:13 PM jean wrote:
    I agree with the rest maybe a little better too! Thanks for all you share I enjoy reading your email as I get them.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:20 PM Judy wrote:
    I have to agree with the others. I like the clean look of the font, but maybe a tad bigger.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:38 PM Angie wrote:
    I like the font. It's easy to read and I don't have to scroll down as much since it is smaller. It may be more difficult for some people to read if they have a hard time reading smaller fonts.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:50 PM Mary Lou Kemp wrote:
    Like the typeface.....its pure, clean and easy to read.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:52 PM Kathy K. wrote:
    Hi Gina, I could read the typeface just fine - easy and smooth reading - and about a beautiful card, well...life is good!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:53 PM Julie (Joypup on SCS) wrote:
    The font is great. Bigger is ok, but might make posts really long!

    Thanks for the info -- esp. about the setting... I am liking the Macro setting for getting rid of visual clutter in the background...
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 8:57 PM Lynne Hurlburt wrote:
    Yes, this font is great, easy on the eyss too. Have a great day, Hugs n' Stuff, Lynne
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 9:04 PM Lori G. wrote:
    Like the others, love the font, need a bigger size.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 9:06 PM Mary C. Anderson wrote:
    Looks great Gina. Great job in getting such a beautiful picture of Alicia holding the acorn.

    Thank you for all that you do.

    Mary
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 9:08 PM Mary Ellen wrote:
    Really plain and easy to read.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 9:11 PM Bobbi in KY wrote:
    I like the old type better
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 9:27 PM Kristina wrote:
    Hi Gina! I like the font style, but I agree with the others that would like it a little larger. It would make it just a little easier to read. I loved the card and really appreciate it that you shared your supply list. I wasn't going to get the argyle embossing folder, but after I saw what an elegant card that you created with it, well, let's just say that I am seriously rethinking that. I'm so grateful that I discovered your blog and some of the other amazing artists on SCS. You really inspire me. Thanks for all you do.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 9:39 PM Darlene L wrote:
    The font is fine, but I really need the print to be either just a little larger or a little darker but these "old" eyes. Thanks for asking our input. Darlene
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 10:02 PM Shawna wrote:
    I love it! The easier to read the better, in my opinipn. You have a great blog Gina!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 10:25 PM Kelli wrote:
    the typeface is just fine!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 10:25 PM Cheri H wrote:
    Love the font...just needs to be a smidge bigger.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 10:37 PM Gail wrote:
    I agree with most that the font could be a bit bigger, but I like the clean typeface and love your artistry and your blog. Thanks for sharing your talents and your family doings with us. The stamping community is a very caring place, I've learned, whether you are known personally or only cyberly(?). =)
    Gail
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 11:15 PM Deb Neerman wrote:
    I like the type face you used in your last post! Much easier to read!

    Thanks for caring about us!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 11:21 PM Marcia C. wrote:
    A little larger font (1 to 2 sizes) would be easier for those of us who surf late at night!!!
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 11:32 PM Shelby Dunning wrote:
    I do like the larager font. I have to sit so close with my grannies that I get a backache and have to quit before I get all emails read. Thanks for changing.
    Reply to this
  • 9/9/2008 11:56 PM Yvonne/Scrappy wrote:
    I agree! I like the typeface, but maybe it could be a bit larger?
    Reply to this
  • 9/10/2008 1:15 AM Norma Woodward wrote:
    I agree, much easier to read, but a little bigger would be great.
    Reply to this
  • 9/10/2008 5:24 AM Denise wrote:
    I like the new type face, it's very clean and easy to read. Thanks for answering our questions on your last post.
    Reply to this
  • 9/10/2008 8:09 AM Joyce Cook wrote:
    I like the typeface but I too would like to see it just a tad bit larger for those of us who have eyes that aren't as young as they used to be. Of course my eyes are old but I'm not. lol
    Reply to this
  • 9/10/2008 8:49 AM Annie wrote:
    Gina - I like the new font. It's easy to read and it does go with your redesigned blog. Have a great day!
    Reply to this
  • 9/10/2008 9:53 AM Laurie wrote:
    Hi Gina, it must be good. I didn't notice the change. Either that or I was mezmerized by the acorn pic. Acorns are my favorite little things. I just can't resist them. Everyone is busy casing your cards while I will be casing your photos Anyway, I like it. Thanks for asking.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.